HAVANA, Cuba, April 22 (acn) Cuban Parliament President Ricardo Alarcon met in Havana with the head of the international relations committee of the Federation Council, the upper house of parliament, Mikhail V. Marguélov.
Marguélov heads a delegation visiting Cuba at the invitation of the Cuban National Assembly, reported Granma newspaper.
The meeting took place in an environment of sincerity and cordiality in a demonstration of the excellent relations shared between the two parliaments.
The Russian official also met with Cuban Vice President of the Council of Ministers Ricardo Cabrisas Ruiz to discuss future cooperation between the two countries and strengthening ties.
Also attending the meetings were the vice minister of the International Relations Committee, Ilyás Umakhanov, and Russian Ambassador to Cuba Mikhail L. Kamynin.
Marguélov's delegation will fulfill a working program that includes several meetings with Cuban government and state officials and visits to places of historical and social interest.
(Recibe Alarcón a dirigente Cámara Alta de Rusia)
miércoles, 22 de abril de 2009
Obama And The Blockade
Yesterday I referred to what was funny about the “Declaration of
Commitment of Port of Spain”.
Today I could refer to what is tragic about it. I hope our friends do not take any offence in this. There were some differences between the draft that we received, which was going to be submitted by the hosts of the Summit, and the document that was finally published. In all that
last-minute haste, there was hardly any time for anything. Some items had been discussed at long meetings held some weeks previous to the Summit. At the very last moment, proposals such as the one submitted by Bolivia, complicated even more the whole picture. The Bolivian proposal was included as a note in the document. It stated that Bolivia considered that the implementation of policies and cooperation schemes aimed at expanding the use of bio-fuels in the western hemisphere could affect and have an impact on the availability of foodstuffs, the
increase of food prices, deforestation, the displacement of populations as a result of the land demand, and that consequently this could make the food crisis to be even worse, which will directly affect low income persons and, most of all, the poorest economies among developing
countries. The note added that the Bolivian government, while recognizing the need to look for and resort to environmentally friendly alternative sources of energy, such as the geothermal, solar, and eolic sources of energy, and to small and medium size hydro-power generators,
it advocates for an alternative approach, based on the possibility of living well and in harmony with nature, in order to develop public policies aimed at the promotion of safe alternative energies that could ensure the preservation of the planet, our ‘mother land’.
When analyzing this note submitted by Bolivia please bear in mind that the United States and Brazil are the two biggest producers of bio-fuels in the world, something that is opposed by an increasing number of persons in the planet, whose resistance has been growing since the dark
days of George Bush.
Obama’s advisors published in the Internet their version -in English- of the interview the US president granted to some journalists in Port of Spain. At one point, he asserted that there was something he found interesting –an added that he had known of it in a more abstract way but
that he found it interesting in more specific terms- which was listening to these leaders who, when speaking about Cuba, did so referring specifically to the thousands of doctors Cuba is disseminating throughout the region, and finding how much these countries depended on
them. He said this reminded them in the US of the fact that if their only interaction with many of these countries was the war on drugs; that of their only interaction was of a military character, then it was possible that they would not be developing connections that, with time, could enhance their influence with a positive effect when they may find it necessary to advance policies of their interest in the region.
He said he thought that was the reason why it was so important -for the sake of their interaction, not only here in this hemisphere, but in the whole world- to recognize that their military power was just part of their power, and that they have to resort to diplomacy and their aid to development in a more intelligent way, so that peoples could see concrete and practical improvements in the life of ordinary citizens, based on the foreign policy of the United States.
Jake, one of the journalists, said thanks to the President and added that in Port of Spain the President had listened to many Latin American leaders who want the US to lift the embargo against Cuba. The journalist reminded the President he had said that was an important
influence that should not be eliminated. But he added that in 2004 the President did support the lifting of the embargo. He reminded the President he had said that the embargo had not managed to raise the standards of living, that it had squeezed the innocent, and that it was
high time for the US to recognize that that particular policy had failed. The journalist wondered what made the President change his opinion with regards to the embargo.
The President responded that the year 2004 seemed to be thousands of years ago, and wondered what he himself was doing in 2004.
The journalist answered that back then he was running for the Senate.
The President added that the fact that Raul Castro had said his government was ready to talk with the US government not only about the lifting of the embargo but also about other issues, namely, human rights and political prisoners, was a signal of progress. He said there were
some things the Cuban government could do. He added that Cuba could release the political prisoners, reduce the surcharge imposed on remittances, which will correspond with the policies that they have applied, whereby Cuban-American families are allowed to send remittances. He said that it so happened that Cuba applies a very high surcharge. He said that Cuba is exacting significant profits. He added that this would be an example of cooperation where both governments would be working to help the Cuban family and improve the living standards in Cuba.
There is no doubt that the President misinterpreted Raul’s statements.
When the President of Cuba said he was ready to discuss any topic with the US President, he meant he was not afraid of addressing any issue. That shows his courage and confidence on the principles of the Revolution. No one should feel astonished that Raul spoke about pardoning those who were convicted on March, 2003, and about sending them all to the United States, should that country be willing to release the Five Cuban Anti-Terrorism Heroes. The convicts, as was already the case with the Bay of Pig’s mercenaries, are at the service of a foreign power that threatens and blockades our homeland.
Besides, the assertion that Cuba imposes a very high surcharge and obtains significant profits is an attempt by the President’s advisors to cause trouble and division among Cubans. Every country charges a certain amount for all hard currency transfers. If those are made in
dollars, all the more reason we have to do it, because that is the currency of the country that blockades us. Not all Cubans have relatives abroad that could send them remittances. Redistributing a relatively small part of them to benefit those more in need of food,
medicines and other goods is absolutely fair. Our homeland does not have the privilege of converting the money minted by the State into hard currency -something the Chinese very often call “junk money”- as I have explained on several occasions, which has been one of the causes of the present economic crisis. With what money the US is bailing out its banks and multinationals, while plunging future generations of Americans into indebtedness? Would Obama be ready to discuss those issues?
Daniel Ortega stated it very clearly when he remembered the first conversation he had with Carter, which today I will once more repeat:
“I had the opportunity to meet with President Carter, and when he told me that now, after the Somozas’ tyranny had been ousted, and the Nicaraguan people had defeated the Somozas’ tyranny, it was high time ‘for Nicaragua to change’, I said: ‘No, Nicaragua does not need to
change; you are the ones that need to change. Nicaragua has never invaded the United States. Nicaragua has never mined the US ports.
Nicaragua has never launched a single stone against the American nation. Nicaragua has not imposed any government on the United States. You are the ones that need to change, not the Nicaraguans.’ ”
At the press conference, as well as in the final meetings of the Summit, Obama looked conceited. Such attitude by the US President was consistent with the abject positions adopted by some Latin American leaders. Some days ago I said that whatever was said and done at the Summit will be known anyway.
When the US President said, in answering to Jake, that thousands of years had elapsed since 2004 until the present, he was superficial. Should we wait for so many years before his blockade is lifted? He did not invent it, but he embraced it just as much as the previous ten US presidents did. Should he continue down that same path, we could predict he would face a sure fiasco, just as all his predecessor did.
That is not the dream entertained by Martin Luther King, whose role in the struggle for human rights will ever more illuminate the American people’s path.
We are living in a new era. Changes are unavoidable. Leaders just pass through; peoples prevail. There would be no need to wait for thousands of years to pass by; only eight years will be enough so that a new US President –who will no doubt be less intelligent, promising and admired in the world than Barack Obama- riding on a better armored car, or on a more modern helicopter, or on a more sophisticated plane, occupies that inglorious position.
Tomorrow we shall have more news about the Summit.
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 21, 2009
5:34 p.m.
Commitment of Port of Spain”.
Today I could refer to what is tragic about it. I hope our friends do not take any offence in this. There were some differences between the draft that we received, which was going to be submitted by the hosts of the Summit, and the document that was finally published. In all that
last-minute haste, there was hardly any time for anything. Some items had been discussed at long meetings held some weeks previous to the Summit. At the very last moment, proposals such as the one submitted by Bolivia, complicated even more the whole picture. The Bolivian proposal was included as a note in the document. It stated that Bolivia considered that the implementation of policies and cooperation schemes aimed at expanding the use of bio-fuels in the western hemisphere could affect and have an impact on the availability of foodstuffs, the
increase of food prices, deforestation, the displacement of populations as a result of the land demand, and that consequently this could make the food crisis to be even worse, which will directly affect low income persons and, most of all, the poorest economies among developing
countries. The note added that the Bolivian government, while recognizing the need to look for and resort to environmentally friendly alternative sources of energy, such as the geothermal, solar, and eolic sources of energy, and to small and medium size hydro-power generators,
it advocates for an alternative approach, based on the possibility of living well and in harmony with nature, in order to develop public policies aimed at the promotion of safe alternative energies that could ensure the preservation of the planet, our ‘mother land’.
When analyzing this note submitted by Bolivia please bear in mind that the United States and Brazil are the two biggest producers of bio-fuels in the world, something that is opposed by an increasing number of persons in the planet, whose resistance has been growing since the dark
days of George Bush.
Obama’s advisors published in the Internet their version -in English- of the interview the US president granted to some journalists in Port of Spain. At one point, he asserted that there was something he found interesting –an added that he had known of it in a more abstract way but
that he found it interesting in more specific terms- which was listening to these leaders who, when speaking about Cuba, did so referring specifically to the thousands of doctors Cuba is disseminating throughout the region, and finding how much these countries depended on
them. He said this reminded them in the US of the fact that if their only interaction with many of these countries was the war on drugs; that of their only interaction was of a military character, then it was possible that they would not be developing connections that, with time, could enhance their influence with a positive effect when they may find it necessary to advance policies of their interest in the region.
He said he thought that was the reason why it was so important -for the sake of their interaction, not only here in this hemisphere, but in the whole world- to recognize that their military power was just part of their power, and that they have to resort to diplomacy and their aid to development in a more intelligent way, so that peoples could see concrete and practical improvements in the life of ordinary citizens, based on the foreign policy of the United States.
Jake, one of the journalists, said thanks to the President and added that in Port of Spain the President had listened to many Latin American leaders who want the US to lift the embargo against Cuba. The journalist reminded the President he had said that was an important
influence that should not be eliminated. But he added that in 2004 the President did support the lifting of the embargo. He reminded the President he had said that the embargo had not managed to raise the standards of living, that it had squeezed the innocent, and that it was
high time for the US to recognize that that particular policy had failed. The journalist wondered what made the President change his opinion with regards to the embargo.
The President responded that the year 2004 seemed to be thousands of years ago, and wondered what he himself was doing in 2004.
The journalist answered that back then he was running for the Senate.
The President added that the fact that Raul Castro had said his government was ready to talk with the US government not only about the lifting of the embargo but also about other issues, namely, human rights and political prisoners, was a signal of progress. He said there were
some things the Cuban government could do. He added that Cuba could release the political prisoners, reduce the surcharge imposed on remittances, which will correspond with the policies that they have applied, whereby Cuban-American families are allowed to send remittances. He said that it so happened that Cuba applies a very high surcharge. He said that Cuba is exacting significant profits. He added that this would be an example of cooperation where both governments would be working to help the Cuban family and improve the living standards in Cuba.
There is no doubt that the President misinterpreted Raul’s statements.
When the President of Cuba said he was ready to discuss any topic with the US President, he meant he was not afraid of addressing any issue. That shows his courage and confidence on the principles of the Revolution. No one should feel astonished that Raul spoke about pardoning those who were convicted on March, 2003, and about sending them all to the United States, should that country be willing to release the Five Cuban Anti-Terrorism Heroes. The convicts, as was already the case with the Bay of Pig’s mercenaries, are at the service of a foreign power that threatens and blockades our homeland.
Besides, the assertion that Cuba imposes a very high surcharge and obtains significant profits is an attempt by the President’s advisors to cause trouble and division among Cubans. Every country charges a certain amount for all hard currency transfers. If those are made in
dollars, all the more reason we have to do it, because that is the currency of the country that blockades us. Not all Cubans have relatives abroad that could send them remittances. Redistributing a relatively small part of them to benefit those more in need of food,
medicines and other goods is absolutely fair. Our homeland does not have the privilege of converting the money minted by the State into hard currency -something the Chinese very often call “junk money”- as I have explained on several occasions, which has been one of the causes of the present economic crisis. With what money the US is bailing out its banks and multinationals, while plunging future generations of Americans into indebtedness? Would Obama be ready to discuss those issues?
Daniel Ortega stated it very clearly when he remembered the first conversation he had with Carter, which today I will once more repeat:
“I had the opportunity to meet with President Carter, and when he told me that now, after the Somozas’ tyranny had been ousted, and the Nicaraguan people had defeated the Somozas’ tyranny, it was high time ‘for Nicaragua to change’, I said: ‘No, Nicaragua does not need to
change; you are the ones that need to change. Nicaragua has never invaded the United States. Nicaragua has never mined the US ports.
Nicaragua has never launched a single stone against the American nation. Nicaragua has not imposed any government on the United States. You are the ones that need to change, not the Nicaraguans.’ ”
At the press conference, as well as in the final meetings of the Summit, Obama looked conceited. Such attitude by the US President was consistent with the abject positions adopted by some Latin American leaders. Some days ago I said that whatever was said and done at the Summit will be known anyway.
When the US President said, in answering to Jake, that thousands of years had elapsed since 2004 until the present, he was superficial. Should we wait for so many years before his blockade is lifted? He did not invent it, but he embraced it just as much as the previous ten US presidents did. Should he continue down that same path, we could predict he would face a sure fiasco, just as all his predecessor did.
That is not the dream entertained by Martin Luther King, whose role in the struggle for human rights will ever more illuminate the American people’s path.
We are living in a new era. Changes are unavoidable. Leaders just pass through; peoples prevail. There would be no need to wait for thousands of years to pass by; only eight years will be enough so that a new US President –who will no doubt be less intelligent, promising and admired in the world than Barack Obama- riding on a better armored car, or on a more modern helicopter, or on a more sophisticated plane, occupies that inglorious position.
Tomorrow we shall have more news about the Summit.
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 21, 2009
5:34 p.m.
Etiquetas:
Reflections by Comrade Fidel
Havana Gears Up for NAM Ministerial Meeting
HAVANA, Cuba, April 22 (acn) More than 120 countries have confirmed attendance at the Ministerial Meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) Coordinating Committee, to take place in Havana from April 27 to 30.
The announcement was made by Abelardo Moreno, deputy minister of Foreign Relations and Cuban ambassador to the United Nations. He said this meeting is particularly important, “for two essential reasons: (1) this will be the last ministerial meeting under Cuba’s mandate, and (2) the final arrangements for the coming 15th NAM Summit to be held in Egypt from July 11 to 16 are to be made here,” Granma newspaper reported.
Moreno also said that more than 60 ministers, most of them foreign ministers, had confirmed attendance. He said that in the last few weeks, intense negotiation working sessions were held in New York for drawing up the 467 paragraphs that comprise the Final Declaration, which is to
be discussed at the meeting. But most important, the Cuban diplomat said, is that the working guidelines of NAM, the reaffirmation of its guiding principles and policy, were agreed to in New York.
In this regard, he described the document as “detailed and diverse.” It includes an assessment on the current international situation and deals with other issues like decolonization and self-determination processes, regional conflicts, human rights, migration, drug trafficking,
disarmament and natural resources.
Moreno pointed out that in the chapter devoted to Latin America and the Caribbean, NAM advocates, the necessity of putting an end to the US blockade on the island, and giving back the territory that the United States illegally occupies in Guantanamo.
It also explicitly offers support and solidarity to the government of Evo Morales, in Bolivia.
He mentioned too that this is the first NAM meeting after the Israeli attack against the Palestinian people in the Gaza strip, an event that should be addressed by this organization.
Moreno said the President of the UN General Assembly Miguel has been invited to this ministerial meeting because of the hard economic crisis facing the world today, and noted that NAM will try to adopt common positions towards this complex scenario.
Attending delegations will session in two groups: from April 27 to 28 for high level officials, and from April 29 to 30, at the ministerial level with two commissions, one on policies and one on society and economy.
When summarizing the role of Cuba as the NAM chair, Abelardo Moreno said, “We’ve achieved a healthy, strong movement, with a high level of coordination in the Group of 77; a movement in which agreeing on points of view and solidarity have become everyday practices.”
(Lista La Habana para Ministerial del MNOAL)
The announcement was made by Abelardo Moreno, deputy minister of Foreign Relations and Cuban ambassador to the United Nations. He said this meeting is particularly important, “for two essential reasons: (1) this will be the last ministerial meeting under Cuba’s mandate, and (2) the final arrangements for the coming 15th NAM Summit to be held in Egypt from July 11 to 16 are to be made here,” Granma newspaper reported.
Moreno also said that more than 60 ministers, most of them foreign ministers, had confirmed attendance. He said that in the last few weeks, intense negotiation working sessions were held in New York for drawing up the 467 paragraphs that comprise the Final Declaration, which is to
be discussed at the meeting. But most important, the Cuban diplomat said, is that the working guidelines of NAM, the reaffirmation of its guiding principles and policy, were agreed to in New York.
In this regard, he described the document as “detailed and diverse.” It includes an assessment on the current international situation and deals with other issues like decolonization and self-determination processes, regional conflicts, human rights, migration, drug trafficking,
disarmament and natural resources.
Moreno pointed out that in the chapter devoted to Latin America and the Caribbean, NAM advocates, the necessity of putting an end to the US blockade on the island, and giving back the territory that the United States illegally occupies in Guantanamo.
It also explicitly offers support and solidarity to the government of Evo Morales, in Bolivia.
He mentioned too that this is the first NAM meeting after the Israeli attack against the Palestinian people in the Gaza strip, an event that should be addressed by this organization.
Moreno said the President of the UN General Assembly Miguel has been invited to this ministerial meeting because of the hard economic crisis facing the world today, and noted that NAM will try to adopt common positions towards this complex scenario.
Attending delegations will session in two groups: from April 27 to 28 for high level officials, and from April 29 to 30, at the ministerial level with two commissions, one on policies and one on society and economy.
When summarizing the role of Cuba as the NAM chair, Abelardo Moreno said, “We’ve achieved a healthy, strong movement, with a high level of coordination in the Group of 77; a movement in which agreeing on points of view and solidarity have become everyday practices.”
(Lista La Habana para Ministerial del MNOAL)
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)